Jay

  • I love the web, but I also spent a large part of my life loving movies too. And it feels like I’ve continuously witnessed an industry that has tried to put cinema to death. It’s happened a few times, and the latest cycle of never-ending franchises stamped out to appeal to the largest possible global audiences seems like the latest attempt.

    Today I saw this trailer, which was co-written by Kareem Rahma of Subway Takes fame:

    Without having seen it already, I can tell you that there’s at least something about it I love. It’s this wonderful, small-market, self-contained indie flick that clearly has something to say and a style to try to do it in. It’s the kind of film that Noah Baumbach and the Duplass brothers were making when I was coming up in that world and falling in love with movies.

    You can’t kill cinema. The industry will try, trust me. But people won’t let it happen. They will just keep making films that they love and that hope others love. They will make it with heart. They will pour themselves into their art. Every time you try to knock cinema down a new generation of filmmakers will bring back to life. It’s unkillable.

    The industry tries to kill the web off from time to time as well. I’ve certainly witnessed plenty of those cycles as well. But it’s unkillable too.

  • I saw this on Bluesky recently.

    And I think it gets to the root of what I don’t like about AI. It’s not about how good it is at certain things, or how magical it can feel, or whether it not it can trick people into thinking a human might of been behind something it created. Honestly, I don’t really care. Human beings are incredible, and we are worth far more than machines.

  • I wrote about Bill Gross, and Goto.com once. He’s a fascinating individual that figured out the key to monetizing search years before Google would eventually copy him. He has a certain way of understanding technology as inevitable and rolling along with it, rather than trying to resist it.

    He appears to have made the same determination about AI. I’m not sure I agree that we should give up on the resist part, but if anybody’s going to save at least some semblance of the open web from the onslaught of AI, it may very well be Bill Gross. John Batelle, who wrote the literal book on Google, appears to agree.

    Batelle has taken an interest in Gist.AI, a new startup that grew out of Gross’ startup accelerator and that he is now at the helm at. Gross is approaching the problem of AI with his usual pragmatism, and proposing a solution that focuses on partnerships between publishers and AI search.

    Those ravenous AI bots hoovering up websites at a rate of thousands of crawls a day? They’re shoplifting, Gross says. AI services should pay for the privilege of ransacking the open Internet, he argues. This concept – “pay per crawl” – has already taken root: Internet infrastructure giant CloudFlare has implemented a pay-per-crawl marketplace premised on a similar philosophy. Publishers that aren’t being paid by those data-hungry AI bots can now avail themselves of a free service from CloudFlare that blocks them at the door. 

    Batelle seems to seem think that Gist.AI might give publishers the tools to fight back against the larger AI companies. I’ve actually heard rumblings about Gist in the publisher world, so maybe he’s right. He certainly has been before.

  • Cleanse your palette with a collection of Abandoned Blogs, curated by Lucy Pham. I truly don’t remember where I stumbled on this anymore, which I suppose is fitting. But it’s an incredible testament to the vastness and peculiarities of the web. Fight back. Build a blog. Make it awesome (but don’t abandon it).

  • Samuel Arbesman is publishing a new book about code, but with a different slant than what you’ll usually see. He once said this about code:

    I like to think of code as a sort of reverse centrifuge, spinning huge numbers of topics together and intimately connecting them. These topics range from our attempts to model the world, the nature of history, how we think and use language (both natural and computational), to even biology, philosophy, and serendipity.

    This book is an attempt to peel back that curtain and lay bare the artifice that’s been constructed around computing. And to have some fun. And those are some very lofty goals, and sorely needed right now, as the programming world spends much of its time trying to abstract away the best bits of itself.

    This one is shooting to the top of my list.

  • The Internet Phonebook is sold out. There should be more copies in stock soon though. It’s a cool idea from Kristoffer Tjalve and Elliott Cost that curates a directory of lovely personal websites into a physical directory and book you can carry around with you. Each site has a phone number that, when dialed through the phonebook’s dial-a-site feature, will direct you to the right place.

    This is paired with some lovely essays that give you a chance to feel the weight of( a corner) of the Internet in the real world. I love any opportunity to bring a caring side of the web out of our screens and out into the world.

    That phone to web connection makes me think of net artist Heath Bunting, who created an online directory of phone numbers for payphones at King’s Cross Station in London. Visitors to the site were encouraged to call around 5PM for maximum effect and to connect with other web citizens that might drift towards the phone at that time.

    The web and the real world are the same thing. I like projects that acknowledge that.

  • It’s the 13th Global Accessibility Awareness Day today. A good reminder that there are a lot of web folks who care a hell of a lot about this kind of thing. And it’s the little things, in aggregate, that can help us shake off efforts that are hostile to accessible experiences.

  • Season two of Computer Freaks is an insightful and sharp look at how commerce on the web forever transformed it. Chritine Haughney Dare-Bryan expands on the story she told about the Internet in the podcast’s first season. But a story that begins with detailed discussions of protocols and capabilities of a newly commercial web quickly becomes a story about viewpoints, and ideology, and the way that personalities clashed on the most exciting technology of modern history.

    One of the players in all of this was Kevin Hughes. It’s a name that hasn’t been associated with the web’s history too often, but who’s contribution to the early web was massive. Hughes was fundamnetal in the design of early ecommerce systems, and he created the design language that’s second nature to us all these days: the green security lock to mark a page as secure, the early interactions with forms.

    But Hughes worked alongside giants that would build the second iteration of the web, most notably Marc Andreessen and the team he built at Netscape. A team that would take on and ultimately supplant the work being done at EIT. In the shuffle, Hughes story was mostly forgotten except in old recordings and transcripts. This podcast is at least, in part, an attempt to shift that.

    Near the end of series, and without giving too much away, Haughney surfaces the greatest fissure that happened during this commercial boom. The web’s innovators self-sorted.

    One the one side were the perceived “winners,” the capitalists that seized control of the moment, turned the web mainstream, and gave it a commercial purpose.. This is not meant to be a purely cynical take. Some of this path was laid with the best of intentions, and it’s difficult to imagine a web as broad and accessible as it is today without these contributions.

    It’s the other side that get’s forgotten. The idealists. The tinkerers. They imagined a future web about access and openness. They came to the web to do things that they loved, and they imbued their work with a little bit of themselves.

    Hughes belonged to that latter group, and there’s a line towards the end of the podcast that brought me to tears (a bit of emphasis mine).

    You know, I met so many millionaires and people that went on to become billionaires…

    When you live in this world, it was easy to see people change a bit and get caught up in things that brought them far from where they started. And I made it a point to just not think that way. So by the time I moved into the small room in my friend’s house after all this in Oahu, I just kept on doing what I knew how to do the best way I could. And I remember a friend commenting to me about this. He said, I can’t believe you just went through all of that, but you’re still you. You haven’t really changed. And I thought that was really nice of him to say that

    Hughes went through tremendous tragedy during the collapse of the dot-com era. He eventually turned away from it to hang up his hat in Oahu and work on fostering arts and technology in his local community in Hawaii.

    We forget sometimes that the web was created by idealists. It broadened minds. It showcased learning and culture for its own sake. It was made by and for people that remained themselves, even when it was convenient not too. That’s the web that Kevin Hughes wanted. And maybe, just maybe, we’ve let too many people in the room that represent product and not enough that represent ideals. But it’s not too late to still build it.

  • There are two events drifting the web back to a place of what feels like peaceful simplicity.

    CSS Day is coming up in June. It’s speaker lineup is packed with some of the most thoughtful CSS practitioners and creators the web has. There’s a lot to be excited about there, but what’s most refreshing is that it’s about CSS. No frameworks, no vibe coding. Just. Simple. CSS.

    They will be talking about building something sustainable and sturdy using CSS as a foundation. They’ll be returning to a core technology that makes the web great and showing what it makes possible in practice.

    Then there’s the jQuery reunion. jQuery left its mark on the history of web development. But it’s important to remember that its genesis began at a time when the web was filled with a lot of potential. And I think it’s fair to say that jQuery helped it find that potential and deliver it to a massive audience (something it’s also fair to say it’s largely still doing on many, many websites).

    It’s a good moment to return to. To turn over and examine what we were all trying to gain and work towards in that moment. I expect we’ll see a lot of that kind of thing at the reunion.

    Hidden in these examinations of the core technologies of the web is a desire to return to a web design industry that was innovating and creating at a rapid clip. The vision of the web was to share, outwardly, information with one another. And returning to simplicity is often what makes that possible. It makes the web broadly accessible. It turns anyone into a web creator.

    Maybe us old timers will keep trying to make things simple. And maybe that’s a good thing actually.

  • Google is planning to allow users under 13 to use their AI product, Gemini. But like so many others in this space, they are giving the game away:

    Like its Workplace for Education accounts, Google says children’s data will not be used to train AI. Still, in the email, Google warns parents that “Gemini can make mistakes,” and kids “may encounter content you don’t want them to see.”

    Our legal frameworks have begun to fall apart in the age of AI. Section 230, for instance, is difficult to apply in an age when there is no personal responsibility. If I prompt AI to make me something, and it generates something illegal, how do we regulate that?

    There have been some strides but a combination of powerful lobbying and technical incoherence in the federal government is slow.

    Google is going to test the limits of COPPA with this one. If you work on the web, you have likely had to make adjustments to sites to ensure compliance with COPPA. It’s a pretty smart law and it protects children using the web from having their data improperly collected. That’s why Google is making this claim. That way we they can say later they tried their best, but AI is just too difficult to control.

    We can’t allow companies to pass their accountability over the machines.